Dual association of autoimmune encephalitis with anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 antibodies: A Case Report with Literature Review

Authors

  • Oumaima Rian Internal Medicine Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8718-8719
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have influenced the objectivity or outcome of this article.
  • Wafa Ammouri Internal Medicine Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V university, Rabat, Morocco.
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have influenced the objectivity or outcome of this article.
  • Latifa Oualili Medical Intensive Care Unit, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have influenced the objectivity or outcome of this article.
  • Mouna Maamer Internal Medicine Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have influenced the objectivity or outcome of this article.
  • Tarek Dendane Medical Intensive Care Unit, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have influenced the objectivity or outcome of this article.
  • Hicham Harmouche Internal Medicine Department, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have influenced the objectivity or outcome of this article.
  • Khalid Abidi Medical Intensive Care Unit, Ibn Sina University Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8799-5247
    • Conceptualization
    • Investigation
    • Writing – Original Draft Preparation
    • Writing – Review & Editing
    Competing Interests
    The authors declare that they have no competing interests that could have influenced the objectivity or outcome of this article.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.71079/ASIDE.IM.062125105

Abstract

Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis is the most common type of autoimmune encephalitis, whereas anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (antiGAD65) encephalitis is a rare autoimmune condition. The coexistence of these two conditions has been rarely reported. In this article, we will discuss this rare association through a case report and attempt to determine its main characteristics. We report the case of an 18-year-old male with no medical history, admitted to the medical Intensive Care Unit (ICU) with a decreased level of consciousness, bizarre behavior, and abnormal movements for one week. These symptoms followed the progression of initial signs such as delirium, which had begun two months earlier. Laboratory analysis revealed an inflammatory syndrome with rhabdomyolysis. Cerebral angio-MRI findings were unremarkable. The electroencephalogram (EEG) showed slow, non-reactive activity. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis and infectious studies were normal. However, immunological testing using the immunofluorescence technique revealed the presence of anti-NMDAR antibodies in both serum and CSF, as well as anti-GAD65 antibodies in the serum. The positron emission tomography (PET) scan screening for neoplasm was negative. Therapeutically, the patient was treated with anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, intravenous immunoglobulins, corticosteroids, plasma exchanges, cyclophosphamide, and rituximab. Consequently, he demonstrated a remarkable gradual clinical improvement. This case highlights an aspect of autoimmune dysregulation that may lead to atypical and severe clinical presentations. The co-occurrence of anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 encephalitis is a rare condition that can lead to severe manifestations. Early diagnosis using a broad antibody panel facilitates timely and appropriate management.

Keywords:

Anti-GAD65, Anti-NMDAR, Autoimmune encephalitis, Immunotherapy, Case report

Full Text

Introduction

Over the past years, research on autoimmune encephalitis has identified numerous antibodies responsible for different disease subtypes [1]. In a multicenter population-based prospective study conducted in the United Kingdom, anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (anti-NMDAR) encephalitis accounted for 4% of all causes of encephalitis [2]. In a nationwide cohort study in the Netherlands, anti-NMDAR encephalitis represented 17.5% and anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase 65 (antiGAD65) encephalitis 13.5% of autoimmune encephalitis and paraneoplastic neurological syndromes [3].

Autoimmune encephalitis can present with clinical manifestations of varying severity. A study by Gaspard N et al. reported that autoimmune encephalitis was responsible for 37% of cases of refractory status epilepticus; among these, anti-GAD65 accounted for 2%, and anti-NMDAR encephalitis for 12% [4]. The ICU-CompoSE study (ICU–Complications of Severe Encephalitis) found that anti-NMDAR encephalitis accounted for 62% and anti-GAD65 encephalitis for 6% of patients with autoimmune encephalitis admitted to the ICU. In this study, mechanical ventilation, sepsis, tumor presence, and autonomic dysfunction were associated with prolonged ICU stays or incomplete recovery [5].

Although the co-occurrence of different types of autoimmune encephalitis has been reported, the coexistence of anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 encephalitis is rare, with limited data available regarding the severity of this association. Herein, we report the case of an 18-year-old male diagnosed with both anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 encephalitis who was admitted to the ICU due to a decreased level of consciousness. The patient received first- and second-line immunotherapies, resulting in a gradual and sustained clinical recovery.

Case Presentation

We report the case of an 18-year-old Moroccan male patient with no medical history, admitted to the medical intensive care unit for decreased level of consciousness, abnormal movements, and fever. These symptoms had developed one week prior to admission, following the progression of initial symptoms, including delirium, bizarre behavior, and hallucinations, which had begun two months earlier after a flu-like episode. On admission, the patient was febrile with a temperature of 39.2∘39.2^\circC and had a Glasgow Coma Scale score of 1111. He exhibited mutism, was unresponsive to stimuli, and showed generalized rigidity. Autonomic dysfunctions were also noted, including sinus tachycardia at 166166 bpm, hypertension of 170/100170/100 mmHg, hypersalivation, bradypnea at 1111 breaths per minute, and generalized tonic-clonic seizures that required intubation.

Laboratory analysis revealed an inflammatory syndrome (C-reactive protein: 33.533.5 mg/L, procalcitonin: 0.260.26 ng/L) with rhabdomyolysis (creatine kinase: 60796079 UI/L). Toxicological screening was negative. Cerebral CT scan and angio-MRI findings were unremarkable. Electroencephalogram (The EEG was performed 1010 days after the initiation of anticonvulsant treatment, which had been started prior to hospital admission) showed slow and non-reactive activity without epileptiform discharges. CSF analysis and infectious studies were normal except for a traumatic CSF sample with a white cell count of 2121/mm³, 80%80\% lymphocytes, and a red cell count of 2200022\,000/mm³. The protein level in CSF was 0.620.62 g/L (normal range: 0.400.40–0.600.60 g/L), and the glucose level was 0.720.72 g/L. Serologic testing for HIV, HBV, HCV, CMV, EBV, HSV, VZV, TPHA, and VDRL was negative. Autoimmune conditions were suspected. However, a second cerebral MRI, antinuclear antibodies (ANA), and anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) were normal. Immunological testing using immunofluorescence revealed positive anti-NMDAR antibodies in both serum and CSF (Cerba laboratories) as well as low positive anti-GAD65 antibodies in serum (25.825.8 IU/mL, reference ≤17\leq 17 IU/mL). Multiple glucose tests were within normal limits. Due to financial constraints, autoantibodies titers and analysis of oligoclonal bands could not be performed. However, a positron emission tomography (PET) scan for neoplasm screening was negative. Based on the 2016 autoimmune encephalitis guidelines [6], a diagnosis of anti-NMDAR encephalitis with probable anti-GAD65 encephalitis was established.

Therapeutically, the patient was treated with anticonvulsants, antipsychotics, intravenous immunoglobulins (22 g/kg), and corticosteroid pulses (1515 mg/kg), followed by steroids at 11 mg/kg/day. Unfortunately, he developed septic shock due to ventilator-associated pneumonia, which was managed with appropriate antibiotics. Due to a lack of clinical improvement, he underwent five sessions of plasma exchanges, but no significant improvement was observed. According to international guidelines for the management of autoimmune encephalitis [7], Cyclophosphamide (0.60.6 g/m²) was initiated. However, it was later switched to rituximab (11 g) because of cyclophosphamide’s potentially serious side effects, including myelosuppression, malignancy, and infertility, particularly concerning in younger patients. Subsequently, the patient showed remarkable clinical improvement, allowing for a gradual extubation on day 7878 of hospitalization. Thereafter, he was transferred to another department for rehabilitation before being discharged home.

After discharge, the patient continued to exhibit mild frontal syndrome symptoms and was maintained on rituximab at a dose of 11 g every six months. At the 66-month follow-up, he had returned to his normal life without any relapses. Unfortunately, follow-up antibody titers could not be obtained due to financial constraints.

Discussion

Autoimmune encephalitis is the third most common cause of encephalitis, following infectious encephalitis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis [2]. It includes a group of immune-mediated inflammatory disorders characterized by antibodies that can target different sites, such as intracellular components (e.g., Anti-GAD65), neuronal surface antigen (e.g., Anti-NMDAR), and intracellular onco-neuronal antigen (e.g., Anti-Ma) [7]. Tumor infections can trigger the production of these antibodies or can be cryptogenic [8]. This autoimmune condition can affect individuals across all age groups, with some subtypes predominantly affecting children and young adults [9].

The exact pathophysiological mechanism underlying the co-association of autoimmune encephalitis remains under investigation. However, they may involve an underlying immunogenetic predisposition and autoimmune responses triggered by infections or neoplasms. These infections can contribute to potentially autoreactive immune responses in different ways. On one hand, they may initiate or exacerbate autoimmune responses by creating a pro-inflammatory environment. Alternatively, they could disrupt peripheral tolerance mechanisms, facilitating the action of previously suppressed autoreactive effector cells [10].

On the other hand, infections may activate autoimmunity through molecular mimicry, where peptides derived from infectious agents resemble self-proteins, leading to the production of antibodies against NMDA receptors and GAD65. Nevertheless, molecular mimicry is unlikely to be the only underlying mechanism for autoimmune responses. Other mechanisms, including breaches in central tolerance, non-specific bystander activation, and persistent antigenic stimulation, may also contribute to developing autoimmune diseases [11].

Clinical manifestations are diverse and may include common symptoms such as behavioral changes, psychosis, seizures, abnormal movements, and cognitive deficits [9]. Additionally, specific symptoms are associated with particular antibodies. For instance, anti-NMDAR encephalitis is typically characterized by short-term memory impairment, orofacial dyskinesia, and autonomic dysfunction (all of which were observed in our case), whereas anti-GAD65 encephalitis may present with stiff person syndrome, limbic encephalitis, or cerebellar ataxia [12]. In our case, the patient presented only with stiff person syndrome. Other symptoms, such as limbic encephalitis and cerebellar ataxia, have been reported in only one case of this association.

Beyond clinical manifestations, autoimmune encephalitis also frequently co-occurs with other systemic or neurological conditions. For example, anti-GAD65 encephalitis is commonly linked to systemic autoimmune disease, particularly diabetes, and may co-occur with other antibodies in 19% of cases, in particular, GABAA^{\mathrm{A}}R, GABAB^{\mathrm{B}}R, and VGKC antibodies [13]. In contrast, anti-NMDAR encephalitis can be accompanied by demyelinating disorders, such as multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and MOG antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), in 3.3% of cases [14]. Nevertheless, the coexistence of anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 encephalitis has been sporadically reported. The table below summarizes the main characteristics of this association based on reported cases in the literature [15,16,17,18].

Table 1
Comparison of the profile of anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD 65 encephalitis in the reported cases
McEntire et al [16] USA Kammeyer et al [15] USA Gomez Oropeza et al [17] Mexico Calderon et al [18] Mexico Our case
Age 58 years 66 years 18 years 28 years 18 years
Sex F M F M M
History Adult-onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension, bell’s palsy Chronic tobacco NM No history No history
Prodromal symptoms No No Headache Covid-19 Flu like syndrome
Fever No No No Yes Yes
Initial presentation Cognitive decline Neurological Behavioral symptoms, myoclonus Psychiatric symptoms Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms
Psychosis No No No Yes Yes
Seizure Yes No No Yes Yes
Behavioral symptoms No Yes Yes Yes Yes
Abnormal movements No Yes Yes No Yes
Catatonia Yes No No Yes Yes
Cognitive impairment Yes Yes Yes No Yes
Cerebellar ataxia No Yes No No No
Stiff person syndrome No No No No Yes
Autonomic dysfunction No No No No Yes
Central hypoventilation No Yes No No Yes
Brain MRI Normal Limbic and brainstem encephalitis Normal Signal abnormalities in the bilateral anterior cingulate cortex and temporal lobes Normal
EEG Right temporal epileptiform discharge Diffused and intermixed pattern Mild generalized dysfunction Subcortical dysfunction in the frontal, temporal and occipital regions Slow and non-reactive activity
CSF Pleocytosis Pleocytosis with lymphocytic predominance Normal Normal Normal
Auto-antibodies detection NMDA: CSFGAD65: CSF and serum NDAR: CSFGAD65: serumMa1+Ma2: CSF CSF CSF NMDA: CSF and serumGAD65: serum
Tumor NM Suspected lung neoplasm NM No No
Treatments GC, IVIG, RTX IVIG, PLEX, RTX GC, PLEX, RTX GC, IVIG GC, PLEX, IVIG, CYP, RTX
Time to treatment initiation NM 2 months NM 2 weeks 2 months
Prognosis Favorable Questionable outcome Favorable Favorable with persistent irritability and agitation Favorable
Relapse NM After 1 month After 2 months No No
Median Follow up NM 1 month 4 months 6 Weeks 10 months
ICU No NM No Status epilepticus Decreased level of consciousness
Mechanical ventilation No NM No Yes Yes
Death No NM No No No

F, Female; M, Male; NM, Not mentioned; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; GC, Glucocorticoids; IVIG, Intravenous immunoglobulins; PLEX, plasma exchange; RTX, Rituximab; CYP, Cyclophosphamide; MRI, Magnetic Resonance Imaging; EEG, Electroencephalogram; NDAR, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; NMDA, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor; GAD65, Glutamic acid decarboxylase, 65 kDa isoform; Ma1, Ma2, Ma1/2 antibodies; ICU, Intensive Care Unit.

The median age of the reported case was 37.6 years, ranging from 18 to 66 years. There was a slight male predominance (60%), which may be related to the small sample size (n=5). Adult-onset diabetes was found in one patient (20%). A flu-like syndrome was reported as a prodromal syndrome in two patients (40%). The most common initial presentation was psychiatric symptoms, observed in three patients (60%). Seizures and abnormal movements occurred in 60% of cases, while cognitive impairment was reported in four cases (80%). Central hypoventilation was noted in two of four cases (50%).

Brain MRI findings were normal in 60% of patients (one case showed signal abnormalities, and another revealed limbic and brainstem encephalitis). EEG abnormalities were noted in 100% of the cases. CSF analysis was normal in 60% of cases. Autoantibodies testing was performed in CSF, serum or both. Neoplasm screening was conducted in 40% of cases: one result was negative, and the other revealed strong suspicion of pulmonary neoplasm (chronic tobacco, presence of speculated pulmonary nodules with adjacent pulmonary thickening, and positivity for anti-Ma1 and anti-Ma2 antibodies).

Low titers of anti-GAD65 antibodies in serum were observed in 60% of cases, including ours. A review article by Gaspard noted that low concentrations of anti-GAD65 antibodies were associated with a heterogeneous spectrum of symptoms. None of the patients exhibited overlapping syndrome in that study, suggesting that this may be a specific future of pathogenic anti-GAD65 antibodies. The identification of GAD65 antibodies should not prevent clinicians from investigating the presence of additional antibodies, in particular, GABAA^{\mathrm{A}}, GABAB^{\mathrm{B}} receptor antibodies, as they seem to increase the risk of an underlying neoplasm [19].

All patients received first-line immunotherapy: glucocorticoids in 80%, intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) in 60%, and plasmapheresis in 60% of the cases. Second-line immunotherapy with rituximab was administrated in 80% of cases, which may reflect the severity of this co-occurrence of anti-GAD65 and anti-NMDAR encephalitis. Two patients (40%) were admitted to the ICU due to neurological deterioration (status epilepticus in one case and deceased level of consciousness in the other). Relapses occurred in 40% of cases, with a median time of one and a half months. The overall prognosis was favorable in four cases, although persistent irritability and irritation were noted in one patient (20%).

The overall outcome for both types of encephalitis is generally favorable. In a cohort study of 501 patients with anti-NMDAR encephalitis by Titulaer et al., first-line immunotherapy was administrated in 95% of the patients, 57% received second-line immunotherapy, 81% had good neurological outcomes at 24 months of follow-up, 12% experienced one or more relapses, and 6% died. Additionally, 39.5% of patients had tumors, and early treatment was associated with good neurological outcome [20].

In contrast, a case series of 37 patients with anti-GAD65 neurological autoimmunity reported by Qiu et al. showed that all patients received first-line immunotherapy, 51.35% received second-line immunotherapy, and 81.3% showed a partial to good response at follow-up. However, 53.1% experienced a relapse, and 3.1% died. Tumors were suspected only in 5.4% of cases, and in this study, early treatment was not correlated with good neurological outcome [21].

In the reported cases summarized in the table below, all patients received first-line immunotherapy, 80% underwent second-line immunotherapy, 40% experienced a relapse, and only one had a tumor.

These results highlight the importance of rapid diagnosis to initiate treatment promptly and prevent prolonged ICU stays, as well as the necessity of long-term follow-up to detect early relapses and potential neoplasm. Given the small number of reported cases with co-occurring anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 encephalitis, further studies involving larger cohorts are needed to confirm the characteristics of this association.

Conclusions

The co-occurrence of anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 encephalitis is a rare condition that can cause severe manifestations. The non-specific neuropsychiatric symptoms often lead to delayed or missed diagnoses. A broad antibody screening panel can prevent multiple lumbar punctures and avoid unacceptable delays in diagnosis and targeted cancer screenings.

中文摘要

伴随抗NMDAR和抗GAD65抗体的自身免疫性脑炎双重关联:病例报告与文献综述

抗N‑甲基‑D‑天冬氨酸受体(anti‑NMDAR)脑炎是最常见的自身免疫性脑炎类型,而抗谷氨酸脱羧酶65(anti‑GAD65)脑炎是一种罕见的自身免疫性疾病。两种疾病共存的报道极为罕见。本文通过病例报告讨论这一罕见关联,并尝试确定其主要特征。我们报告了一名18岁男性,既往无病史,因意识下降、怪异行为和异常运动持续一周入院医学重症监护室(ICU)。这些症状继两个月前出现的谵妄等初始表现后出现。实验室检查显示炎症综合征伴横纹肌溶解。脑血管造影磁共振成像(angio‑MRI)结果无异常。脑电图(EEG)显示慢波、无反应性活动。脑脊液(CSF)分析和感染学检查均正常。然而,采用免疫荧光技术的免疫学检测显示血清和CSF中均存在抗NMDAR抗体,血清中还检测到抗GAD65抗体。正电子发射断层扫描(PET)筛查肿瘤为阴性。治疗上,患者接受抗癫痫药、抗精神病药、静脉注射免疫球蛋白、皮质类固醇、血浆置换、环磷酰胺和利妥昔单抗。随后,他表现出显著的逐步临床改善。该病例突显了一种可能导致非典型且严重临床表现的自身免疫失调。抗NMDAR和抗GAD65脑炎的共存是一种罕见情况,可能导致严重表现。使用广谱抗体面板进行早期诊断有助于及时和适当的管理。

本中文摘要为机器辅助翻译,仅供参考;以英文摘要为准。 Machine-assisted Chinese translation of the English abstract; the English abstract is the version of record.

References

1. Leypoldt F, Armangue T, Dalmau J. Autoimmune encephalopathies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences ;1338(1):94–114. Available from: https://nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/nyas.12553

2. Granerod J, Ambrose HE, Davies NW, Clewley JP, Walsh AL, Morgan D, et al. Causes of encephalitis and differences in their clinical presentations in England: a multicentre, population-based prospective study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2010 Dec;10(12):835–44. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S147330991070222X

3. Kerstens J, Schreurs MWJ, De Vries JM, Neuteboom RF, Brenner J, Crijnen YS, et al. Autoimmune Encephalitis and Paraneoplastic Neurologic Syndromes: A Nationwide Study on Epidemiology and Antibody Testing Performance. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2024 Nov;11(6):e200318. Available from: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/NXI.0000000000200318

4. Gaspard N, Foreman BP, Alvarez V, Cabrera Kang C, Probasco JC, Jongeling AC, et al. New-onset refractory status epilepticus: Etiology, clinical features, and outcome. Neurology. 2015 Nov 3;85(18):1604–13. Available from: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/WNL.0000000000001940

5. Schubert J, Brämer D, Huttner HB, Gerner ST, Fuhrer H, Melzer N, et al. Management and prognostic markers in patients with autoimmune encephalitis requiring ICU treatment. Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm. 2019 Jan];6(1):e514. Available from: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000514

6. Graus F, Titulaer MJ, Balu R, Benseler S, Bien CG, Cellucci T, et al. A clinical approach to diagnosis of autoimmune encephalitis. The Lancet Neurology. 2016 Apr;15(4):391–404. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1474442215004019

7. Abboud H, Probasco JC, Irani S, Ances B, Benavides DR, Bradshaw M, et al. Autoimmune encephalitis: proposed best practice recommendations for diagnosis and acute management. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;92(7):757–68. Available from: https://jnnp.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/jnnp-2020-325300

8. Dutra LA, Abrantes F, Toso FF, Pedroso JL, Barsottini OGP, Hoftberger R. Autoimmune encephalitis: a review of diagnosis and treatment. Arq Neuro-Psiquiatr. 2018 Jan; 76(1):41–9. Available from: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2018000100041&lng=en&tlng=en

9. Dalmau J, Graus F. Antibody-Mediated Encephalitis. Ropper AH, editor. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar;378(9):840–51. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMra1708712

10. Rickenbach C, Gericke C. Specificity of Adaptive Immune Responses in Central Nervous System Health, Aging and Diseases. Front Neurosci. 2022 Jan 20;15:806260. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.806260/full

11. Rojas M, Restrepo-Jiménez P, Monsalve DM, Pacheco Y, Acosta-Ampudia Y, Ramírez-Santana C, et al. Molecular mimicry and autoimmunity. Journal of Autoimmunity. 2018 Dec; 95:100–23. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0896841118305365

12. Patel A, Meng Y, Najjar A, Lado F, Najjar S. Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Physician’s Guide to the Clinical Spectrum Diagnosis and Management. Brain Sciences. 2022 Aug 25;12(9):1130. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/9/1130

13. Gagnon MM, Savard M. Limbic Encephalitis Associated With GAD65 Antibodies: Brief Review of the Relevant literature. Can J Neurol Sci. 2016 Jul;43(4):486–93. Available from: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0317167116000135/type/journal_article

14. Titulaer MJ, Höftberger R, Iizuka T, Leypoldt F, McCracken L, Cellucci T, et al. Overlapping demyelinating syndromes and anti–N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptor encephalitis. Annals of Neurology. 2014 Mar;75(3):411–28. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ana.24117

15. Kammeyer R, Piquet AL. Multiple co-existing antibodies in autoimmune encephalitis: A case and literature review. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2019 Dec ;337:577084. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0165572819303170

16. McEntire C, Manzano G, Linnoila J. Co-Occurring NMDA-Receptor and Anti-GAD65 Antibodies in the CSF of a Patient With Encephalitis: Case Report. Neurology. 2022 Dec 5;99(23_Supplement_2). Available from: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/01.wnl.0000903592.90530.d1

17. Oropeza IG, Fuentes I, Medina SM. Early Relapse in Anti-GAD65 and Anti-NMDA Co-expression Associated Autoimmune Encephalitis: A Case Report. Neurology. 2024 Oct 8;103(7_Supplement_1). Available from: https://www.neurology.org/doi/10.1212/01.wnl.0001051444.24716.31

18. Valadez-Calderon J, Ordinola Navarro A, Rodriguez-Chavez E, Vera-Lastra O. Co-expression of anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 antibodies. A case of autoimmune encephalitis in a post-COVID-19 patient. Neurología. 2022 Jul;37(6):503–4. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0213485321002462

19. Gaspard N. How Much GAD65 Do You Have? High Levels of GAD65 Antibodies in Autoimmune Encephalitis. Epilepsy Curr. 2020 Aug 25;20(5):267–70. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7653657/

20. Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, Armangué T, Glaser C, Iizuka T, et al. Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Neurology. 2013 Feb;12(2):157–65. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1474442212703101

21. Qiu Z, Xu F, Zhang M, Yang X, Han Y, Li D, et al. Clinical Features of Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase‐65 Neurological Autoimmunity: A Case Series From China. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2025 Feb;31(2):e70237. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cns.70237

Data Availability Statement

All data supporting the findings of this study are included in the article. Additional information is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request. 

Share this article

Published

Issue

Section

Case Report

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Rian O, Ammouri W, Oualili L, et al. Dual association of autoimmune encephalitis with anti-NMDAR and anti-GAD65 antibodies: A Case Report with Literature Review. ASIDE Int Med. 2025;1(4):18-22. doi:10.71079/ASIDE.IM.062125105

Article history

Received
11 May 2025
Received in revised form
1 Jun 2025
Accepted
13 Jun 2025
Published
21 Jun 2025