Motion-Artifact ‘Pseudo–Type A Dissection’ on Ungated CTA in a Morbidly Obese Patient with Resolution on ECG-Gated CTA: A Case Report
PDF

Keywords

Aortic dissection
ECG-gated CTA
Obesity
Case report

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Arora A, Elsayed A, Ayoub WJ, Elsayed Y, Arora Y. Motion-Artifact ‘Pseudo–Type A Dissection’ on Ungated CTA in a Morbidly Obese Patient with Resolution on ECG-Gated CTA: A Case Report. ASIDE Case Reports. 2026;2(4):1-5. doi:10.71079/ASIDE.CR.012126279

Abstract

We present a case of acute chest pain in a 48-year-old morbidly obese female with multiple comorbidities that raised suspicion for Acute Aortic Syndrome (AAS). The initial ungated PE-protocol CT angiogram (CTA) revealed a linear low-attenuation band in the ascending aorta consistent with a motion artifact-induced pseudo-flap. This finding led to two Transesophageal Echocardiograms (TEEs): the first, performed under conscious sedation, was positive; the second, performed under general anesthesia (GA) to minimize artifact, was negative. To definitively assess the findings, a confirmatory ECG-gated CTA was performed immediately after heart rate control, which was negative for both pulmonary embolism (PE) and aortic dissection. The final diagnosis was Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (ADHF), and the patient was discharged on Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy. This case illustrates that the ungated PE-protocol CTA is critically suboptimal for the ascending aorta and underscores the need to use a dedicated ECG-gated CTA when AAS is suspected, particularly in obese patients prone to motion artifacts, to prevent diagnostic error and unnecessary surgical intervention.

PDF

References

1. Qanadli SD, El Hajjam M, Mesurolle B, Lavisse L, Jourdan O, Randoux B, Chagnon S, Lacombe P. Motion artifacts of the aorta simulating aortic dissection on spiral CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1999: 1 [PMID: 10050797, https://doi.org/10.1097/00004728-199901000-00001]

2. Uppot RN. Technical challenges of imaging & image-guided interventions in obese patients. Br J Radiol. 2018: 20170931 [PMID: 29869898, https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170931]

3. Isselbacher EM, Preventza O, Hamilton Black J, 3rd, Augoustides JG, Beck AW, Bolen MA, Braverman AC, Bray BE, Brown-Zimmerman MM, Chen EP, Collins TJ, DeAnda A, Jr., Fanola CL, Girardi LN, Hicks CW, Hui DS, Schuyler Jones W, Kalahasti V, Kim KM, Milewicz DM, Oderich GS, Ogbechie L, Promes SB, Gyang Ross E, Schermerhorn ML, Singleton Times S, Tseng EE, Wang GJ, Woo YJ, Peer Review Committee M. 2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022: e334 [PMID: 36322642, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001106]

4. Expert Panel on Cardiac I, Kicska GA, Hurwitz Koweek LM, Ghoshhajra BB, Beache GM, Brown RKJ, Davis AM, Hsu JY, Khosa F, Kligerman SJ, Litmanovich D, Lo BM, Maroules CD, Meyersohn NM, Rajpal S, Villines TC, Wann S, Abbara S. ACR Appropriateness Criteria(R) Suspected Acute Aortic Syndrome. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021: S474 [PMID: 34794601, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.09.004]

5. Bankier AA, O'Donnell CR, Boiselle PM. Quality initiatives. Respiratory instructions for CT examinations of the lungs: a hands-on guide. Radiographics. 2008: 919 [PMID: 18635620, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.284085035]

6. Modica MJ, Kanal KM, Gunn ML. The obese emergency patient: imaging challenges and solutions. Radiographics. 2011: 811 [PMID: 21571658, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.313105138]

7. Fursevich DM, LiMarzi GM, O'Dell MC, Hernandez MA, Sensakovic WF. Bariatric CT Imaging: Challenges and Solutions. Radiographics. 2016: 1076 [PMID: 27232505, https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2016150198]

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Alok Arora, Ahmed Elsayed, Yuvraj Arora, Yousif Elsayed, Wadah Jason Ayoub